Sunday, 25 January 2015

Mocking the Sacred – Time for Muslim Introspection





وَلَئِن سَأَلْتَهُمْ لَيَقُولُنَّ إِنَّمَا كُنَّا نَخُوضُ وَنَلْعَبُ ۚ قُلْ أَبالله وَآيَاتِهِ وَرَسُولِهِ كُنتُمْ تَسْتَهْزِئُونَ
And if you ask them, they will surely say, "We were only conversing and playing." Say, "Is it Allah and His Signs and His Messenger that you were mocking?" [at-Tawbah: 65]

When the hypocrites were confronted with their mocking statements, they replied that they were just joking. The above verse is Allāh’s reply unto them.  

Wisdom is the lost camel of the Muslim. If need be, we are obliged to obtain wisdom even from the creatures who mock Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  and ensure that no aspect of their evil is to be found amongst ourselves. The sad reality is that despite major and obvious distinctions, Muslims too are guilty of mocking the sacred. Some introspection would do us good.  

Surely my Timing is Off?

The sincere critic might well say that even the impression of equating Muslims and the cartoon creatures is not at all politic at the time when we are still hurt at their provocations. I would say that unfortunately the attacks against Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  and Islām are so constant, that it is pointless to refer to a time of provocation and a time of cessation. There are merely ebbs and flows in the battle. Beyond that, our dignity lies is being true to our principles, including admitting when we are wrong. Muʿāwiyah bin ʾAbī Sufyān (may Allāh be pleased with both father and son) abandoned territory he had just conquered from the Byzantines, when it was pointed out to him that his interpretation of the end of the truce was flawed. There is no more public figure than the Commander of the Believers. Yet there is no loss of face to admit an error, even to the unbelievers. All honour belongs to Allāh. He elevates and disgraces as He pleases.

Humour of Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  

Again, lest the middle path be missed, Muslims are not to be dour, nor should they joke inappropriately. Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  joked without being lewd, insulting people or mocking the sacred.

عن أنس أن  رجلا من أهل البادية كان اسمه زاهرا ، وكان يهدي إلى النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - الهدية فيجهزه رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - إذا أراد أن يخرج ، فقال رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - : " إن زاهرا باديتنا ونحن حاضروه " .
وكان النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - يحبه ، وكان [ رجلا ] دميما ، فأتى النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - يوما وهو يبيع متاعه ، فاحتضنه من خلفه وهو لا يبصره ، فقال : أرسلني من هذا ؟ فالتفت فعرف النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - فجعل لا يألو ما ألصق ظهره بصدر النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - حين عرفه ، وجعل النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - يقول : " من يشتري العبد ؟ " . فقال : يا رسول الله ، إذا والله تجدني كاسدا ، فقال النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - : " لكنك عند الله لست بكاسد " . أو قال : " [ لكن ] عند الله أنت غال
A man from the countryside, called Zāhir bin arām used to bring gifts to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  would in turn provide him with provisions when he intended to leave. Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  said, “Zāhir is our countryside and we are his city.” The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم  loved him, and he was an ugly man. One day the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم  approached him while he was selling his goods. He embraced him from behind, so that he could not see him. “Release me!” he said, “Who is this?” When he turned and recognised the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم , he kept rubbing his back against the chest of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم  then began calling out, “Who will buy this slave?” “O Messenger of Allāh,” he replied, “By Allāh! You will find me to be a defective product.” The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم  replied, “No, you are most valuable in Allāh’s sight.”

 Similarly it was nothing strange for his Companions to joke with him in a wholesome manner.

عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ الأَشْجَعِيِّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ ، قَالَ : " بَيْنَا نَحْنُ مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآَلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي غَزْوَةِ تَبُوكَ ، وَرَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآَلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي قُبَّةٍ مِنْ أَدَمٍ ، إِذْ مَرَرْتُ ، فَسَمِعَ صَوْتِي ، فَقَالَ : " يَا عَوْفُ بْنُ مَالِكٍ ، ادْخُلْ " ، فَقُلْتُ : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ، أَكُلِّي أَمْ بَعْضِي ؟ فَقَالَ : " بَلْ كُلُّكَ " ، قَالَ : فَدَخَلْتُ
ʿAwf bin Mālik al-ʾAsjaʿī (may Allāh be pleased with him) narrated:
We were with Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  on the Tabūk campaign. Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  was in a [small] leather tent which I passed by. He heard my voice and called, “O ʿAwf bin Mālik! Enter!”
“O Messenger of Allāh!” I responded, “Should the whole of me enter, or just part of me?”
He replied, “All of you.”
I thereupon entered. [al-Bukhārī]

Sacred is not limited to Muammad صلى الله عليه وسلم  

Sūrāh at-Tawbah makes it clear that Allāh takes offense at insult to three:
1.       Allāḥ Himself
2.       His Signs
3.       Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  

One should ask that why is it that we only excite ourselves over the third, and worse, involve ourselves in insulting the sacred as well. I had previously written about the insults heaped on Jesus peace be upon him. A cursory examination of western art, literature, movies, theatre etc, would reveal that he is a hundred times more insulted than Allāh’s Messenger, Muḥammad صلى الله عليه وسلم . If we as Muslims were honest, we would express our hurt at this as well.

Yet how can we truly be hurt at the abuse of Jesus peace be upon him, when Allāh’s honour means nothing to us? A friend of the Muslim physicist I had mentioned previously, expressed his immense amusement in mentioning some movie or the other, in which to my understanding, Allāh transfers His powers to a man who uses this power to enlarge a woman’s breasts. The physicist asked if I saw the movie. When I refused to dignify the question with a reply, he said, “I thought as much. You probably regard it as blasphemous.”

Such then is the state of educated Muslims. Such an insult against Allāh is only blasphemous to myself, nobody else, and never should our voices be raised in protest at such filth.

Daily Ridicule of the Sacred

A negative aspect of the free availability of religious knowledge in the information era, is the incorrect application into the mundane of what should be uttered with caution and respect. The sacred is not a joke. I am not interested in the technical justifications the overly intellectual may present, I simply ask that if your defence is, “It is only a joke,” then what is the difference between you on the one hand, and the hypocrites who made the same argument, and the cartoon creatures who insist that Muslims need to learn how to laugh at their religion?

I have no intention or inclination to compile an encyclopaedia of the free flowing tongues of the Muslims, but hope that two examples will suffice:

1.       “Sign of Qiyāmah”
2.       A certain politician dies and his reckoning takes place.

Sign of Qiyāmah / Day of Resurrection

Every so often you will hear a Muslim uttering a statement, “Wow, you are early today…..this is a sign of Qiyāmah; that stingy man invited me to a feast…. This a sign of Qiyāmah….” Etc.

Do we not pause for moment at our supposed wit and reflect that the very mention of the Day of Reckoning should make our hearts tremble? We should shed tears at the thought of what answer do we give our Creator in regards the non-fulfilment of His rights and people’s rights. If our hearts were correct, we should lose sleep at the thought of that day. How hardened have our hearts become and how contaminated are our minds, that the Reckoning is now a device to demonstrate my wit and make people laugh.

Signs of Qiyāmah are serious matters. What is your mentality that you equate your daily mundane acts with earthquakes, massacres of Muslims, the Anti-Christ etc? Are you so important?

Signs of Qiyāmah are what Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  told us to be so. However intelligent we may be, do we have knowledge of the unseen to say this is a sign of Qiyāmah? And no! Do not tell me it is a joke. This entire chapter of knowledge is based on the words of Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  . He was most serious about it. Do not joke about Allāh’s Signs and His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم ! Do not quote the hypocrites in your defence.

Those who were in the company of Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  would never quote him on any topic unless they were absolutely sure what he had said. On the topic of Signs of Qiyāmah, we have no teacher other than Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  . So why are you so free with your tongue? Do you not realise the implication? To say something is a sign of Qiyāmah, you imply that Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  made this statement. Fear Allāh in regard your tongue. There are so many topics to joke about. Why turn Qiyāmah into fun and games? How different are you to the cartoon creatures?

Reckoning of a Politician


Another “great” example of Muslim wit is their depiction of a politician dying.

They will say that the deceased meets “St Peter at the Pearly Gates”.  Is this the ʿaqīdah [belief] of the Muslims? Do you not realise that you are calling Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  a liar?

Is it funny to claim to know what happens in the realms of the unseen? To claim knowledge of the unseen is ascribing partners unto Allāh. So is it a joke? Does a Muslim then make jokes on a topic which is the worst unforgivable sin unto Allāh?

These jokes invariably proceed with, “God says to him…” as if that is somehow cleaner than “Allāh says…” If you are not educated then may Allāh educate you. If you are educated and are aware of the enormous import of saying, “Allāh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم  said…” even in jest, then how possibly can you joke, “God says…” Is there really nothing else to joke about?

Main Distinction no Justification

Although Muslims who make these jokes are different to the cartoonists, in the sense that no Muslim would make these jokes with malicious intent, we understand from the adīth that we have to guard our tongues. There are limits to what we can say, as we are so fond of telling the west in our debates on freedom of expression. Whatever distinction there might be in intention and degree of jest, it is hypocritical of us to expect the west to respect our sacred when we too mock the sacred.



سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi












Monday, 12 January 2015

Conspiracy Theory & the Qurʾān

عَنْ جَابِر بْن عَبْدِ اللَّهِ - رضى الله عنهما – قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -: الْحَرْبُ خُدْعَةٌ

Jābir رضي الله عنه narrated that the Prophet صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم said, “War is deception.” [Muslim]

The problem with trying to follow the middle path as we are commanded to do, is that there will usually be extremes on either side condemning moderation as proof of belonging to the “other camp.” If however, our intention is to earn Allāh’s pleasure, then let us continue anyway.

Whether the Charlie Hebdo incident is true as depicted or yet another false flag is not what I am addressing here. To my mind, when the same Hollywood script is used ad nauseam and they can’t come up with a better plot of Muslim terrorists who keep leaving their passports and ID cards for the good guys to find, then something is definitely amiss. Those who understand such matters better are more suited to research the oddities and contradictions of these scripts. Or perhaps I could volunteer to write some more innovative scripts. I wonder how much they pay?

What I do wish to address is our attitude to news and conspiracy, for I find that there are two extreme reactions, both ignoring the middle path. There are those who immediately respond to every situation, that is has to be a conspiracy. This group spends an inordinate amount of time examining every word, colour, logo, body language, angle, you name it, and see a conspiracy in it. Coincidence does not exist in their vocabulary. Beyond concerns for their mental health, my greater concern is where such excess leads one to compromise one’s beliefs. Note how many Sunnis were entrapped by the Shīʿāh Arrivals Series. As I have already written about that group, let us look at the other extreme.

Chain of Narrators


The other extreme are those who accept everything CNN vomits out to be as true as the Word of our Creator. When it comes to our Islamic sciences, the very same people will point out that a certain Khabar (news) is narrated by a man who lied once in his life, or it is an isolated narration, or there was only a single witness, and a host of other reason for classifying it as a weak narration. I would ask, why do the same criteria not apply to your news and your resultant press statements? Why do certain news items, reported in thousands of publications, but ultimately all derived from Reuters, not deserve to be downgraded as “khabar of one narrator?” Please note, I am not in any way disparaging the Islamic sciences or the services of the classical scholars. I am pointing out a dichotomy amongst modern Muslim leaders.

Painting Your Acceptance of Western News as an Act of Faith


More nauseating than the simple accepting of face value news without question, is the supposed Islamic justification that I have heard. It has been touted that to research a conspiracy is a sign of weak faith. Say again? Yes, it is argued that everything is in Allāh’s plan. To give any credence to someone’s plot is to negate belief in Allāh’s plan. If you do not believe in Allāh’s plan you are a bad, bad Muslim. To turn the convoluted argument the other way – He who believes in Allah and the Last Hour shall believe in CNN and Fox News or burn in Hell. Such scholars are surely related to those who used to prostrate themselves before the Moghul Emperor, Akbar, and argue, “We are NOT bowing to one besides Allah. We are merely performing zameen bosi – kissing the earth.” The mentality and willingness to serve a human master are so similar.

Did Allāh’s Messenger not mention Deception?


Pirate ships would fly the flag of the ship the intending attacking, to allay their fear, and then attack. The other ship was deceived by a “false flag.” This is but one tactic of many historically recorded methods of deception within warfare and Allāh’s Messenger صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم himself noted, “War is deception.”

In the modern era false flags have become vastly more sophisticated and entail more intensive plotting and the goals are more than just a Spanish silver-bearing ship. The list of modern government sanctioned false flags aimed at waging wars and conquering countries are extensive. They are not the theories of conspiracists, but are historically known or revealed facts. Some of these false flags which were touted as “true news” just as Charlie Hebdo is today, include:

  • ·         Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964. America made it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so that they could invade Vietnam.

  • ·         The Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939. Blamed Finland and invaded Finland.

  • ·         Japanese troops set off an explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria.


The list of verified incidents is long. False flags operations can be traced to the 19th century and many are linked to the two world wars. ALL were reported as fact in the press at the time. The truth was revealed later. So why are Muslims so eager to accept every “news” item more eagerly than what they accept a Hadith?

Long before that, as recorded in the Qurʾān


The Qurʾān describes a conspiracy which took place thousands of years ago. It was aimed at assassinating the Prophet Salih (peace be upon him):

They said: "Swear one to another by Allah that we shall make a secret night attack on him and his household, and thereafter we will surely say to his near relatives: `We witnessed not the destruction of his household, and verily, we are telling the truth.''' So they plotted a plot, and We planned a plan, while they perceived not. [an-Naml: 49-50]

Beyond this incident, the Qurʾān repeatedly mentions plotting of the enemies of Islām. How possibly then can it be claimed that verifying or researching a conspiracy is a sign of no faith? I fear that the only answers are either ignorance, or deliberate service unto a master who is not Allah.

May Allah keep us physically and spiritually safe in the trials to come. May we be moderates as defined in the Sunnah, free of extremes.

سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi

Sunday, 11 January 2015

Conspiracy Theory & the Qurʾān



عَنْ جَابِر بْن عَبْدِ اللَّهِ - رضى الله عنهما قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -:  الْحَرْبُ خُدْعَةٌ

Jābir رضي الله عنه  narrated that the Prophet  صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم   said, “War is deception.” [Muslim]

The problem with trying to follow the middle path as we are commanded to do, is that there will usually be extremes on either side condemning moderation as proof of belonging to the “other camp.” If however, our intention is to earn Allāh’s pleasure, then let us continue anyway.

Whether the Charlie Hebdo incident is true as depicted or yet another false flag is not what I am addressing here. To my mind, when the same Hollywood script is used ad nauseam and they can’t come up with a better plot of Muslim terrorists who keep leaving their passports and ID cards for the good guys to find, then something is definitely amiss. Those who understand such matters better are more suited to research the oddities and contradictions of these scripts. Or perhaps I could volunteer to write some more innovative scripts. I wonder how much they pay?

What I do wish to address is our attitude to news and conspiracy, for I find that there are two extreme reactions, both ignoring the middle path. There are those who immediately respond to every situation, that is has to be a conspiracy. This group spends an inordinate amount of time examining every word, colour, logo, body language, angle, you name it, and see a conspiracy in it. Coincidence does not exist in their vocabulary. Beyond concerns for their mental health, my greater concern is where such excess leads one to compromise one’s beliefs. Note how many Sunnis were entrapped by the Shīʿāh Arrivals Series. As I have already written about that group, let us look at the other extreme.

Chain of Narrators


The other extreme are those who accept everything CNN vomits out to be as true as the Word of our Creator. When it comes to our Islamic sciences, the very same people will point out that a certain Khabar (news) is narrated by a man who lied once in his life, or it is an isolated narration, or there was only a single witness, and a host of other reason for classifying it as a weak narration. I would ask, why do the same criteria not apply to your news and your resultant press statements? Why do certain news items, reported in thousands of publications, but ultimately all derived from Reuters, not deserve to be downgraded as “khabar of one narrator?” Please note, I am not in any way disparaging the Islamic sciences or the services of the classical scholars. I am pointing out a dichotomy amongst modern Muslim leaders.

Painting Your Acceptance of Western News as an Act of Faith


More nauseating than the simple accepting of face value news without question, is the supposed Islamic justification that I have heard. It has been touted that to research a conspiracy is a sign of weak faith. Say again?  Yes, it is argued that everything is in Allāh’s plan. To give any credence to someone’s plot is to negate belief in Allāh’s plan.  If you do not believe in Allāh’s plan you are a bad, bad Muslim. To turn the convoluted argument the other way – He who believes in Allah and the Last Hour shall believe in CNN and Fox News or burn in Hell. Such scholars are surely related to those who used to prostrate themselves before the Moghul Emperor, Akbar, and argue, “We are NOT bowing to one besides Allah. We are merely performing zameen bosi – kissing the earth.” The mentality and willingness to serve a human master are so similar.

Did Allāh’s Messenger not mention Deception?


Pirate ships would fly the flag of the ship the intending attacking, to allay their fear, and then attack. The other ship was deceived by a “false flag.” This is but one tactic of many historically recorded methods of deception within warfare and Allāh’s Messenger صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم   himself noted, “War is deception.”

In the modern era false flags have become vastly more sophisticated and entail more intensive plotting and the goals are more than just a Spanish silver-bearing ship. The list of modern government sanctioned false flags aimed at waging wars and conquering countries are extensive. They are not the theories of conspiracists, but are historically known or revealed facts. Some of these false flags which were touted as “true news” just as Charlie Hebdo is today, include:


  • ·         Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964. America made it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so that they could invade Vietnam.
  • ·          The Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939. Blamed Finland and invaded Finland.
  • ·         Japanese troops set off an explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria.


The list of verified incidents is long. False flags operations can be traced to the 19th century and many are linked to the two world wars. ALL were reported as fact in the press at the time. The truth was revealed later. So why are Muslims so eager to accept every “news” item more eagerly than what they accept a Hadith?

Long before that, as recorded in the Qurʾān


The Qurʾān describes a conspiracy which took place thousands of years ago. It was aimed at assassinating the Prophet Salih (peace be upon him):
They said: "Swear one to another by Allah that we shall make a secret night attack on him and his household, and thereafter we will surely say to his near relatives: `We witnessed not the destruction of his household, and verily, we are telling the truth.''' So they plotted a plot, and We planned a plan, while they perceived not. [an-Naml: 49-50]

Beyond this incident, the Qurʾān repeatedly mentions plotting of the enemies of Islām. How possibly then can it be claimed that verifying or researching a conspiracy is a sign of no faith? I fear that the only answers are either ignorance, or deliberate service unto a master who is not Allah.

May Allah keep us physically and spiritually safe in the trials to come. May we be moderates as defined in the Sunnah, free of extremes.   


سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi



Sunday, 14 December 2014

Translation of Ḥawqalah






















from:


ahmed <support@kontactr.com>
date:13 December 2014 at 02:19
subject:Kontactr: Translation please


Brother in islam-there is no power to avoid evil and no ability to do good
except through allah most high, most mighty-from imam al-waqidi conquest of
sahabas book.nnwould it be possible to translate into Arabic and Latin words
please nnselam

REPLY

The phrase is called Ḥawqalah, just as “Allāhu Akbar” is called Takbīr.

لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله


Lā ḥāwla wa lā quwwata illā billāh


There is no power to avoid evil and no ability to do good
except through Allah [Most High, Most Mighty]


 

Although commonly translated as, “There is no strength and no might” I find that translation rather simplistic and lacking in sense. What exactly is the wide distinction between might, strength and power or any other synonym in English? Unfortunately this is but an example of the mental laziness of the Muslims. Some well-meaning person might have suggested this incomplete translation decades ago, our mentality is to continue customs of previous generations even in such matters which can be rectified. I had previously written on incorrectly translated common narrations and supplications.

Ḥawl means a power of negation and Quwwah means a power of positive implementation. This distinction is not apparent with, “There is no power/might/strength…” etc

The following extract from Fatḥul Bārī, Commentary on Ṣaḥīḥul Bukhārī, by Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (Allāh’s mercy be upon him), should explain the above and clarify the reasons for my translation:
معنى لا حول لا تحويل للعبد عن معصية الله إلا بعصمة الله ولا قوة له على طاعة الله إلا بتوفيق الله وقيل معنى لا حول لا حيلة وقال النووي : هي كلمة استسلام وتفويض وأن العبد لا يملك من أمره شيئا وليس له حيلة في دفع شر ولا قوة في جلب خير إلا بإرادة الله - تعالى - –

The meaning of lā ḥawla is that the slave cannot turn away from the disobedience of Allāh, except through the protection of Allāh. And he has no quwwah to obey Allāh, except with Allāh granting him the ability. It is also said that lā ḥāwla is lā hīlah (no strategy). An-Nawawi said, “It is a word of surrender and handing over one’s affairs. The slave owns absolutely nothing of his own affair. He has no strategy which can repel evil, and no power in acquiring good except through what Allāh Most High intends.”

سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi

سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi

Translation of Ḥawqalah




from:
ahmed
date:
13 December 2014 at 02:19
subject:
Kontactr: Translation please


Brother in islam-there is no power to avoid evil and no ability to do good
except through allah most high, most mighty-from imam al-waqidi conquest of
sahabas book.nnwould it be possible to translate into Arabic and Latin words
please nnselam
REPLY


The phrase is called awqalah, just as “Allāhu Akbar” is called Takbīr.

لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
Lā ḥāwla wa lā quwwata illā billāh
There is no power to avoid evil and no ability to do good
except through Allah [Most High, Most Mighty]

Although commonly translated as, “There is no strength and no might” I find that translation rather simplistic and lacking in sense. What exactly is the wide distinction between might, strength and power or any other synonym in English? Unfortunately this is but an example of the mental laziness of the Muslims. Some well-meaning person might have suggested this incomplete translation decades ago, our mentality is to continue customs of previous generations even in such matters which can be rectified. I had previously written on incorrectly translated common narrations and supplications.
 
awl means a power of negation and Quwwah means a power of positive implementation. This distinction is not apparent with, “There is no power/might/strength…” etc

The following extract from Fatul Bārī, Commentary on aḥīḥul Bukhārī, by Ibn ajar al-ʿAsqalānī (Allāh’s mercy be upon him), should explain the above and clarify the reasons for my translation:


معنى لا حول لا تحويل للعبد عن معصية الله إلا بعصمة الله ولا قوة له على طاعة الله إلا بتوفيق الله وقيل معنى لا حول لا حيلة وقال النووي : هي كلمة استسلام وتفويض وأن العبد لا يملك من أمره شيئا وليس له حيلة في دفع شر ولا قوة في جلب خير إلا بإرادة الله - تعالى -
The meaning of lā awla is that the slave cannot turn away from the disobedience of Allāh, except through the protection of Allāh. And he has no quwwah  to obey Allāh, except with Allāh granting him the ability. It is also said that lā ḥāwla is lā hīlah (no strategy). An-Nawawi said, “It is a word of surrender and handing over one’s affairs. The slave owns absolutely nothing of his own affair. He has no strategy which can repel evil, and no power in acquiring good except through what Allāh Most High intends.”



 سليمان الكندي
Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Who is the Bravest of People?

عن علي أنه قال: أخبروني من أشجع الناس؟ فقالوا أنت قال: أما إني ما بارزت أحدا إلا انتصفت منه ولكن أخبروني بأشجع الناس قالوا لا نعلم فمن قال أبو بكر إنه لما كان يوم بدر فجعلتم لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم عريشا فقلنا من يكون مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لئلا يهوي إليه أحد من المشركين فوالله ما دنا منا أحد إلا أبو بكر شاهرا بالسيف على رأس رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لا يهوي إليه أحد إلا هوى إليه فهو أشجع الناس قال علي رضي الله عنه ولقد رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وأخذته قريش فهذا يجبأه وهذا يتلتله وهم يقولون: أنت الذي جعلت الآلهة إلها واحدا قال: فوالله ما دنا منا أحد إلا أبو بكر يضرب هذا ويجبأ هذا ويتلتل هذا وهو يقول ويلكم أتقتلون رجلا أن يقول ربي الله ثم رفع على بردة كانت عليه فبكى حتى اخضلت لحيته ثم قال أنشدكم الله أمؤمن آل فرعون خير أم أبو بكر فسكت القوم فقال ألا تجيبونني فوالله لساعة من أبي بكر خير من ألف ساعة من مثل مؤمن آل فرعون ذاك رجل يكتم إيمانه وهذا رجل أعلن إيمانه. أخرجه البزار في مسنده


This might not be a full article and I do not intend writing soon, but upon reading this narration from Musnad al-Bazzār, my heart yearned to share it with others. I intended writing that may Allāh accept the personality described here, but then thought, who am I to think that my supplication of acceptance is needed for one so already accepted? So in following the way of the pious and learned, I can at least say, “May Allāh be pleased with him.”



ʿAlī رضي الله عنه asked, “Tell me, who is the bravest of people?”
“You!” they replied.
He said, “As for me, I never fought anyone except that I exacted justice from him. Tell me, who is the bravest of people?”
They replied, “Then we do not know who.”
He said, “It is ʾAbū Bakr. At the Battle of Badr, you built a hut for Rasūlullāh صلى الله عليه وسلم . We then said, ‘Who will be with Rasūlullāh صلى الله عليه وسلم so that no Mushrik may attack him?’ By Allāh! Not one of us stepped forward except ʾAbū Bakr with his sword drawn by the head of Rasūlullāh صلى الله عليه وسلم . None came to attack except that he attacked him. So he is the bravest of people.”
ʾAlī رضي الله عنه continued, “Indeed I saw the Quraysh grabbing Rasūlullāh صلى الله عليه وسلم . One held him while another violently shook him. They were saying, ‘You are the one who made the gods one!’ By Allāh! None of us dared go near except Abū Bakr. He struck at one of them, pulled back another and shook another, whilst saying, ‘Woe unto you! Do you kill a man for saying my Lord is Allāh?’”
ʿAlī رضي الله عنه then raised the shawl which was upon him and wept until his beard became wet. He then said, “I implore you in Allāh’s name, tell me, is the believer of the people of Pharaoh better or is Abū Bakr?”
The people kept silent, so he said, “Will you not answer me? By Allāh! A single moment of Abū Bakr is superior to a thousand of the likes of the believer of the people of Pharaoh. That was a man who hid his faith and this is a man who publicly announced his faith.”

سليمان الكندي

Twitter: @sulayman_Kindi